Legal Opinion
Polo Fashions, Inc. v. Dick Bruhn, Inc. The Woolen Mill Richard L. Bruhn and Larry Pickens
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 10, 1986No. 85-2280PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
This is a trademark infringement action. The plaintiff, Polo Fashions, Inc. (Polo), prevailed in the district court and received approximately $6,000, the amount of profits the defendants earned from sales of counterfeit Polo shirts. Polo argues that the district court did not award an adequate remedy. We agree in part. Therefore, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
I
FACTS
Polo manufactures a popular line of quality menswear. It goes to great efforts to ensure that its products are of excellent quality and are sold only in suitable establishments. In January…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- William R. Warner & Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Playboy Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation v. Baccarat Clothing Co., Inc., a Corporation, Meier Caspi and Tchia Caspi, IndividualsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
3Cited by71 opinions
- TrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. Edriver Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Intel Corporation v. Terabyte International, Inc., Jean Hsu, Kenneth HsuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Polo Fashions, Inc. v. Craftex, Inc., and Bobby O'Neal and Keith O'neal, Polo Fashions, Inc. v. Craftex, Inc. Bobby O'Neal and Keith O'NealCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Hartman v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Gracie v. GracieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.