Cowles v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtWhitakeR, Judge
Plaintiff sues to recover income taxes paid by him for the year 1934, which taxes, he argues, should not have been paid by him but by a trust of which he was the principal beneficiary. The tax rate would have been lower if the tax had been assessed against the trust, because the income of the trust was smaller than plaintiff’s income. Plaintiff is willing to have subtracted from the amount which he paid and here sues for, the amount which, he urges, the trust should have paid.
Plaintiff was the principal beneficiary of the William H. Cowles, Jr. Trust, set up by plaintiff’s father in 1922 when…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Helvering v. ButterworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Roebling v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
- Spreckels v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Commissioner v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
3Cited by7 opinions
- Village of Kaktovik v. WattCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Hoffman Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Hay v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1967
- Ralph Russell v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Village of Kaktovik v. James G. Watt, Secretary of the Department of the Interior, North Slope Borough v. James G. Watt, Secretary of the Department of the Interior, National Wildlife Federation v. James G. Watt, in His Official Capacity as Secretary, U. S. Department of the Interior, Amoco Production Company, Intervenor-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.