Legal Opinion

Boesker v. Pickett

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 9340PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Wayne Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellee sought and obtained a judgment for personal property claimed by him to be exempt from execution.

The questions first presented are those arising upon the ruling on the appellants’ demurrer to the complaint.

It is said that, as to one of the appellants, the complaint does not even profess to state a cause of action, and does no more than name him as one of the defendants.

Treating the demurrer as a separate one, and not as joint, *555although it is doubtful whether this can be properly done, we shall dispose of the question argued. The allegation is that the defendants wrongfully have…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. CopelandIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Pond v. KimballMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. Russell v. LennonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  4. State ex rel. Haven v. MelogueIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Zielke v. MorganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Prime Mortgage USA, Inc. v. NicholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. RenickerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Astley v. CapronIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Moss v. JenkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Sanders v. HartgeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API