Legal Opinion

Mammi v. American Policyholders Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 1976Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action on an insurance policy, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated April 7, 1975, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, the instant complaint fails to state a cause of action on a third-party beneficiary theory (cf. Embler v Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Ins. Co., 158 NY 431; Jefferson v Sinclair Refining Co., 14 AD2d 238, affd 10 NY2d 422; Duffy v Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 58 Misc 2d 855; Browdy v StateWide Ins. Co., 56…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Embler v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Browdy v. State-Wide InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Jefferson v. Sinclair Refining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Duffy v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1968
  5. Jefferson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API