Legal Opinion · Dissent

Richard Masone v. City of Aventura

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 12, 2014No. SC12-1471, SC12-644Published

1DissentPariente, J.

I dissent because I conclude that, prior to 2010, the Legislature did not expressly preempt the use of red light cameras to the state. In fact, through the Florida Uniform Traffic Control Law, the Legislature actually authorized municipalities to enact municipal ordinances utilizing red light cameras to regulate traffic -within their municipal boundaries. Further, these ordinances were not impliedly preempted by, or in conflict with, state law, as the ordinances did not affect the continued enforcement of the Florida Uniform Traffic Control Law and did not allow for the imposition of a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Sarasota Alliance for Fair Elections, Inc. v. BrowningSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
  3. City of Palm Bay v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Florida · 2013
  4. LABORERS'INTERN., LOCAL 478 v. BurroughsSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  5. City of Orlando v. UdowychenkoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API