Legal Opinion

State v. Deason

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 2007No. 28028PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JEFFREY W. BATES, Judge.

Gary Deason (Defendant) appeals from his conviction for second-degree sodomy. See § 566.064. 1 He contends that the trial court erred by denying Defendant’s request for a continuance and by admitting certain evidence offered by the State during rebuttal. This Court affirms.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

Defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction. This Court considers the facts and all reasonable inferences derived therefrom in a light most favorable to the verdict. State v. Woodmansee, 203 S.W.3d 287, 289 (Mo.App.2006);…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. State v. TisiusSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. State v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  4. State v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  5. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. State v. MiddlemistMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. State v. McClurgMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. JAMES ROBERT CROCKERMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. STATE OF MISSOURI v. WILLIAM GENE MORLANGMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API