Legal Opinion

(PC) Williams v. Hill

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 26, 2025No. 2:23-cv-00958Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MELVIN WILLIAMS, No. 2:23-cv-00958 TLN SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 RICK M. HILL, et al.,, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights 18 action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the undersigned is plaintiff’s motion to strike defendants’ 19 affirmative defenses. (ECF No. 35.) Defendants did not respond to plaintiff’s motion. The 20 undersigned now recommends that the motion be granted in part and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Juan Albino v. Lee BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API