Legal Opinion
United States v. Earl Thomas Anderson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 8, 1990No. 89-10059PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STOTLER, District Judge:
Appellant Earl Thomas Anderson appeals his sentence, pursuant to the Sentencing Guidelines, imposed after a conditional plea of guilty to violation of Title 18 U.S.C. Section 2113(a) and (d), armed bank robbery. The District Court concluded that appellant was properly classified as an organizer, leader, manager or supervisor pursuant to Section 3Bl.l(c) of the Guidelines despite his co-defendant’s unawareness of the criminal enterprise until after commission of the unlawful act. We affirm the District Court’s decision that a two-level increase pursuant to Section 3B…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Wong Kim Bo, A/K/A Yee Kuk Ho, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Trans Alaska Pipeline Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. Brent Eugene Smith, United States of America v. Roberto Osegueya Martinez, United States of America v. Richard Leroy Popp, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Leonard R. FullerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Ervin Earl RutterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Earl Thomas AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Santiago Mares-MolinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.