State v. Whitfield
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.
This appeal involves no determination of fact or procedural error. The goods possessed and sold by defendant were manufactured by convict labor in Alabama. When the alleged offense was committed, the goods were still in the original package in which they were contained at the time of shipment into Wisconsin. The goods were identical in quality with others of the same grade in the open market. None of them were labeled in accordance with the requirements of sec. 132.13, which requires that “all goods, wares and merchandise made by convict labor in any penitentiary, prison, reformatory or other…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- In Re RahrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Child Labor Tax CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Railroad Co. v. HusenSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hammer v. DagenhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. EdwardsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1936