McElhaney v. Eli Lilly & Co.
District Court, D. South Dakota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DONALD J. PORTER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Patricia Smith McElhaney is a “DES Daughter”; she was exposed to the prescription drug diethylstilbestrol (DES) in útero in 1949. She now complains of injuries allegedly caused by such prenatal exposure. 1 Defendant Eli Lilly & Co. admits that it manufactured and marketed the DES which plaintiff’s mother ingested in 1949. 2 Plaintiff’s cause of action is based solely on strict liability in tort. She contends that defendant’s DES, as marketed in 1949, was in a defective and unreasonably dangerous condition to the consumer. Defendant…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Wyeth Laboratories v. ReyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Reyes v. Wyeth LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Seley v. G. D. Searle & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- Woodill v. Parke Davis & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Accutane Litig.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
- Larkin v. Pfizer, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2002
- Jacobs v. Dista Products Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1988
- Patricia McElhaney v. Eli Lilly & Co., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.