Bauss v. Plymouth Township
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and order granting Defendants’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROBERTS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Plymouth Township’s Motion to Dismiss or alternatively, for Summary Judgment and McKenna Associates’ Motion for Summary Judgment. A hearing was held on July, 2005. For the reasons stated, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motions.
II. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Frank Bauss filed a three-count lawsuit against Defendants. Plaintiff alleges: (1) that Defendant Plymouth violated his 14th Amendment procedural due process rights by failing to provide him with…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Paeth v. Worth TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
- Andrews v. City of Mentor, OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
- MELVIN P. LITTERAL v. RYAN WELLS, et al.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2026
- Robertson v. Breakthrough Towing, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022