Legal Opinion

Harden v. Metz

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 19, 1899No. 418PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Montgomery district court; A. H. Skidmore, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Milton, J.:

In July, 1887, the plaintiff in error and one Henry Foster were the owners of certain real estate in Montgomery county, and, together with one N. H. Duncan, who owned an adjacent tract, platted a portion of such lands as a town site, under the name of Larimer, and duly and formally acknowledged the execution of such plat and caused the same to be duly *342recorded in the office of the register of deeds. On the plat was a written statement to the effect that the streets and alleys indicated thereon were “ dedicated” to public use. Larimer became…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Poirier v. FetterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  2. Wood v. National Water Works Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  3. Mo. Riv., Ft. Scott & Gulf R. R. v. WheatonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  4. Giffen v. City of OlatheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  5. Kirkendall v. HuntSupreme Court of Kansas · 1868

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gadarl v. City of HumboldtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  2. Souder v. HicksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API