Legal Opinion

Margaret Wiksell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 25, 1996No. 94-70509Published

1Opinion of the Court

90 F.3d 1459

78 A.F.T.R.2d 96-5697, 96-2 USTC P 50,398,

96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5481,

96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8961

Margaret WIKSELL, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 94-70509.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Feb. 8, 1996.

Decided July 25, 1996.

Bruce I. Hochman, Charles P. Rettig, and Joanna Tulio, Hochman, Salkin & DeRoy, Beverly Hills, California, for petitioner-appellant.

Sara S. Holderness, Tax Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bettye A. Sanders v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Patricia A. Price v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Richard Douglas Furnish and Emilie Furnish Funk v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  4. James A. Guth, and Arlys M. Guth v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Surabhan Ratanasen v. State of California, Department of Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API