Allen v. Emery Independent School Dist.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
(after stating the facts as above.)
The appellant contends that under the court’s findings of fact it conclusively appears 'that the property was by the board of equalization overvalued, as compared with its value. It is argued that such act of the board was legally void, inasmuch as he would have to pay more than his proportionate share of the gross tax, a wrong to him in - violation of the Constitution of the state. Article 8, § 1, Const. The article of the Constitution referred to -expressly provides that all property owned by natural persons or corporations “shall be taxed in proportion to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Johnson v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Duck v. PeelerTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
3Cited by20 opinions
- Rowland v. City of TylerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- City of Waco v. Conlee Seed CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Republic Ins. Co. v. Highland Park Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Howth v. French Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- King v. Falls CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.