Legal Opinion
In re the Marriage of Stigall
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 1988No. 15071PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GREENE, Presiding Judge.
Carolyn Kay Stigall (Kay) appeals from the trial court’s order modifying the child support provisions of a prior dissolution decree, which order set child support for Cynthia Stigall, a minor child of Kay and her former husband, Dallas Wayne Stigall (Dallas), in the sum of $166.66 a month, and which decreed that there was no ar-rearage for back child support.
In her brief filed here, Kay does not question the child support award made on behalf of Cynthia, but does contest the trial court’s ruling on the arrearage question, contending that, by virtue of the terms of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rodgers v. RodgersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- In Re Marriage of PopenhagerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Olson v. OlsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Trice v. TriceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Division of Family Services v. RubleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hodgins v. HodginsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Arnold v. KrewsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Morton v. MortonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- State ex rel. Howell v. HowellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Boyer v. State ex rel. StuerkeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993