Sherman v. Carvill
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Harrison Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.
— Proceedings supplementary to execution; judgment for the appellee, who was the plaintiff below.
The sole ground on which the appellants predicate their appeal is, that the finding and judgment of the court are not supported by sufficient evidence. The only respect in which it is claimed -that the evidence is defective is this, that it was not shown that Sherman, the judgment defendant, had no leviable property, out of which the judgment could have been made, nor that the appellant Jones had money or •credits in his hands belonging to said Sherman.
On the first point, it is sufficient to say…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Baker v. State ex rel. MillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Burkett v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Hopple v. Star City Elev. Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1967
- Mitchell v. Godsey, AdministratrixIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
- Fowler v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.