People v. Thompson
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant claims only that there was "some evidence” of inducement or encouragement and of police methods which created a substantial risk that the offense would be committed by a person not otherwise disposed to commit the crime. At the very most this would constitute a form of "but for” causation, insufficient to entitle defendant to a charge with respect to the affirmative defense of entrapment. Our examination of the record, however, discloses no proof of inducement or encouragement, either "active” or…
2Cited by15 opinions
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. AlwadishNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. PilgrimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. BradleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. MattisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.