Legal Opinion
Cheatham v. 100% Certain Underwriters at Lloyds
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided March 25, 1991No. J-C-89-228PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
STEPHEN M. REASONER, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment filed October 9, 1990, in the above-referenced action. After an initial round of briefing, the Court ordered the parties to address the narrow issue of whether an independent agent (Kaffka) becomes an agent for plaintiff under the facts of this case. The sub-issue the parties were ordered to address in the Order dated October 31, 1990, was whether the independent agent’s statements on the insurance application were binding on the plaintiff. Upon careful review of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Travelers Indemnity Company, a Corporation v. National Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Phœnix Insurance v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dodds v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Harris v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Cheatham (Marvin) v. Indrie (B. David)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992