Legal Opinion

State v. Schneidewind

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1970No. State 20PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

Sehneidewind assigns as errors the denial of his constitutional right to equal protection of the law because of the refusal of the trial court to furnish his counsel a free copy of the transcript of the preliminary hearing; the admission of his confession in evidence because of the failure to give a Miranda warning; 1 the admission in evidence of an inculpatory statement because of the lack of a Miranda warning and because the admission was tainted by an illegal confrontation; and lastly, it is contended the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction.

Free transcript.

A preliminary…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. KnappWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Peterson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. HarperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Barrera v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Holmes v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API