Vezina v. Shermer
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Grand Traverse; Mayne, J. Case by Arthur F. Vezina against Philip Shermer for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
(after stating the facts). The first assignment of error is based upon the refusal of the court to grant defendant’s motion for a new trial. No request was made to the trial court to file reasons for denying the motion, and no reasons were filed by the trial court. No exception was taken to the denial of the motion. • We must hold that this question is not before us on this appeal. Groat v. Railway, 153 Mich. 165 (116 N. W. 1081); Blakeslee & Co. v. Manufacturing Co., 153 Mich. 230 (117 N. W. 92); Act No. 314, chap. 18, § 63, Pub. Acts 1915 (3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 12635).
Defendant next argues…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Groat v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- G. S. Blakeslee & Co. v. Reinhold Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by9 opinions
- McDuffie v. RootMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Tishhouse v. SchoenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Bresch v. WolfMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Stillwell v. GrubaughMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Campbell v. Haughton Elevator & MacHine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.