Pinger v. Guaranty Investment Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SPERRY, Commissioner.
This is a suit for damages alleged to have resulted to plaintiffs growing out of the purchase of a house from defendants. The action is based upon false representations. Verdict and judgment for plaintiffs against all defendants, for compensatory damages, in the amount of $5,400. Defendants Hotaling and Lamar appealed.
Defendant Guaranty Investment Company (hereafter referred to as corporation) was engaged in Kansas City, in the construction of houses for sale. Defendants Hotaling and Lamar, hereafter referred to as appellants, were partners in the r.eal estate business…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Orlann v. LaederichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Harrison v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Delametter v. the Home Ins. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Grisham v. Allen.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Wolf v. Kansas City Tire & Service Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kansas City v. Keene Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Ramel v. Chasebrook Construction CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Owen v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- State ex rel. Wohl v. SpragueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Knepper v. BollingerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.