Utah Copper Co. v. Chandler
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District, Ron. T. D. Lewis, Judge. ‘ Action by the Utah Copper Company against George E. Chandler and others. • Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.
There are two cases — the same plaintiff, different defendants, and different parcels of land.
The plaintiff is the owner of a mining claim in Bingham Canyon. The defendants claim parcels (town lots) of the surface ground by adverse possession; the defendant the *86Bingham. Investment Company a parcel about 23x30 feet, a part of a lot in the town of Bingham Canyon, and upon which is erected and maintained a dwelling house; the defendant Chandler a parcel about 26x50 feet, upon which is erected and maintained a hall.
The eases were tried to' the court upon agreed statements of fact. These the court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Oneto v. RestanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Heilbron v. Last Chance Water Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- Harvey v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Urquide v. FlanaganIdaho Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by10 opinions
- Telonis v. StaleyUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Central Pac. Ry. Co. v. TarpeyUtah Supreme Court · 1917
- Park West Village, Inc. v. AviseUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- Utah Copper Co. v. EckmanUtah Supreme Court · 1915
- Royal Street Land Co. v. ReedUtah Supreme Court · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.