Legal Opinion

Whitaker v. Hearnsberger

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 21, 1951No. 16400PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Plaintiffs in error Whitaker purchased a residence property from defendants in error Hearnsberger in October 1948 for $15,000, of which $12,000 was paid by their promissory note payable in monthly installments of not less than $90 each, including interest, due on the 5th day of each month. Narce Whitaker was a Colonel in the United States Army and the property was occupied by the Whitakers as a home. Having notice of their future transfer by the military authorities to the Philippine Islands, Whitakers listed the property for sale with Marguerite P. Hearnsberger, who was a licensed…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. District Court in & for the Sixteenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. Gold Run, Ltd. v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Matter of Estate of BrooksColorado Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Contract Maintenance Co. v. Local No. 105, Building Service Employees International UnionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  5. PRINCEVILLE CORPORATION v. BrooksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API