Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sullivan v. SulliVan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1992Published

1DissentMikoll, J.

I respectfully dissent. Where a marriage is of long duration, the party seeking the divorce will be held to a high degree of proof (Silvern v Silvera, 147 AD2d *955473, 474). What might be considered substantial misconduct in the context of a marriage of short duration might only be "transient discord” in that of a long-term marriage (see, Thom v Thom, 162 AD2d 811, 812). Proof of irreconcilable or irremedial differences or proof that the marriage is "dead” is insufficient to establish cruel and inhuman treatment (Niles v Niles, 126 AD2d 874).

In my view, two arm twistings and threats uttered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Niles v. NilesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Silvera v. SilveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Thom v. ThomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API