Legal Opinion
State v. Vumback
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 22, 2003No. SC 16696PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether the Appellate Court, in affirming the defendant’s conviction, properly concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied the defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars. We conclude that, although the trial court improperly denied the defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars, the defendant has failed to establish that he was prejudiced by *217the denial of that motion. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Appellate Court on alternate grounds.
The defendant, Ronald Vumback, Jr., was charged with…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. SpigaroloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. TroupeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. HauckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- State v. KylesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. RomeroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. ComminsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. EllisonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State of Connecticut v. David N.J.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. GrantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.