Marriage of Murray v. Murray
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
Appellant appeals a portion of a judgment dissolving the parties’ marriage. Appellant and respondent both claim the trial court’s sua sponte award of legal custody of their two children to the Ramsey County Human Services Department (1) exceeded the court’s authority, (2) deprived the parents of due process and equal protection, and (3) was not supported by the evidence. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
This appeal involves a troubled family that has been involved with social service agencies since 1982. The persons affected are Fred Murray, the father and respondent;…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wallin v. WallinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Currier v. CurrierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Pikula v. PikulaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marriage of Kimmel v. KimmelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- J.M.G. v. J.C.G.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Marriage of Kimmel v. KimmelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Matter of Welfare of J.L.U.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990