Legal Opinion

Pikula v. Pikula

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 5, 1984No. C6-83-1393PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

This appeal is taken from an order dated August 22, 1983, which amended the Findings of Fact issued in a dissolution between the parties and denied appellant’s motion for a new trial. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

The parties were married March 29, 1980, when appellant-mother was 17 and respondent-father was 20. The parties’ two children are girls, Tiffany, age 4, and Tanisha, age 3. The dissolution trial was heard November 9 and 10, 1982. A court ordered custody evaluation, involving at least three social workers, recommended that custody of both daughters remain with the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wallin v. WallinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Peterson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Berndt v. BerndtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Weatherly v. WeatherlySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marriage of Pikula v. PikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Marriage of Kotila v. KotilaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. In Re the Welfare of P.L.C.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Marriage of Murray v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API