Pikula v. Pikula
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
This appeal is taken from an order dated August 22, 1983, which amended the Findings of Fact issued in a dissolution between the parties and denied appellant’s motion for a new trial. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
The parties were married March 29, 1980, when appellant-mother was 17 and respondent-father was 20. The parties’ two children are girls, Tiffany, age 4, and Tanisha, age 3. The dissolution trial was heard November 9 and 10, 1982. A court ordered custody evaluation, involving at least three social workers, recommended that custody of both daughters remain with the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wallin v. WallinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Peterson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Berndt v. BerndtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Weatherly v. WeatherlySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marriage of Pikula v. PikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Kotila v. KotilaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- In Re the Welfare of P.L.C.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Murray v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985