Legal Opinion

State Highway Commission v. Steele

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 7, 1974No. 47,484PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kaul, J.:

This action was brought by the State Highway Commission (hereafter referred to as the Commission) pursuant to K. S. A. 8-5,124 [Repealed, L. 1974, Ch. 587, Sec. 8-2205 and will appear as K. S. A. 1974 Supp. 8-1913] to recover damages to a bridge, which occurred when it was struck by an automobile owned by defendantappellee Ethel E. Steele and driven by defendant-appellee Ronald W. Steele.

The sole question is whether the action is barred by the two-year statute of limitations set forth in K. S. A. 1973 Supp. 60-513 (4).

The facts are not in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Western Shale Products Co. v. City of Fort ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  2. Riggan v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  3. Tresner v. ReesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. City of Wichita v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
  3. State Ex Rel. Schneider v. McAfeeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
  4. State v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1988
  5. Twin City Fire Insurance v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API