Legal Opinion

Twin City Fire Insurance v. Bell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 19, 1983No. 54,693PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Miller, J.:

Twin City Fire Insurance Company and four other Minnesota-based insurance companies brought this action in the Shawnee District Court against Fletcher Bell, Commissioner of Insurance of the State of Kansas, challenging the Commissioner’s interpretation of K.S.A. 40-253 and his authority to assess “retaliatory” charges against the plaintiffs. The trial court held in favor of the Commissioner; the insurance companies appeal.

The facts are not in dispute. All five plaintiffs are foreign insurance companies domiciled in Minnesota and authorized…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Aetna Insurance v. HobbsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  3. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. HobbsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  4. Republic Insurance Co. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. Employers Casualty Co. v. HobbsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATIONDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. GAF Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  3. Employers' Fire Insurance v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  4. Providence Washington Insurance v. Commonwealth, Department of Revenue, Board of Finance & RevenueCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. GAF Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API