Legal Opinion

Gale Sulky Harrow Co. v. Laughlin

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to the district court for Cass county. Tried below before Appelget, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Cobb, Ch. J.

The plaintiff in error is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Michigan, and on June 22, 1887, *104brought its action against the defendant, in the district court of Cass county, alleging that, for a valuable consideration he executed and delivered to the plaintiff his promissory note as follows:

“$65. Cass Co., State of Nebbaska, July 7,1885.
“ On or before the first day of January, 1887, I promise to pay Gale Sulky Harrow Manufacturing Company or order, sixty-five dollars at National Bank of Ashland, Nebraska. Value received. If paid at maturity, interest 7 per cent…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McCartny v. Territory of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clancy v. BarkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Benton v. SikytaNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Berggren v. Hannan, O'Dell & Van BruntNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. ElliottNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Sheridan Coal Co. v. C. W. Hull Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API