Legal Opinion

Heishman v. Heishman

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided February 26, 1985No. 84-815PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONIELSON, Judge.

Defendant appeals from a summary judgment for the plaintiff in an action for recovery of real estate pursuant to Iowa Code chapter 646. She asserts that genuine issues of material fact were raised through her affirmative defenses and a jury trial on those issues should be held. We affirm.

Maynard and Mavis Heishman were divorced in July 1982. The dissolution decree was entered by default and Maynard was awarded the parties’ 80-acre farm, including the homestead. Despite the provisions in the decree, Mavis continued to reside on the property. Maynard farmed the land and for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Knapp v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  2. Scheetz v. IMT Ins. Co.(Mut.)Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  4. Callenius v. BlairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  5. Marshfield Homes, Inc. v. EichmeierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Citizens State Bank v. HardenCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1989
  2. Heishman v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  3. Matter of Estate of LilienthalCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1997
  4. Estate of Kraus v. MummauCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2018
  5. Pablo Benavidez v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API