San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Concurrence
MIKVA, Circuit Judge:
I concur in Parts I and II of Judge Bork’s opinion and in the result reached by Part III. I write separately, however, to emphasize my understanding of the showing necessary before a court may supplement the record by examining transcripts of a closed commission hearing. I cannot accept the view, supra at 44-45, that a petitioner asking a court to review transcripts of this nature must always make a prior and independent showing of agency wrongdoing before the court will examine the transcripts. Like a bank policy of offering loans only to borrowers who do not need loans,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. Porter County Chapter of Izaak Walton League of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Railway Labor Executives' Association v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.