Legal Opinion

San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 25, 1986No. Nos. 81-2035, 83-1073, 84-1042, 84-1410 and 81-2034Published

1Concurrence

MIKVA, Circuit Judge:

I concur in Parts I and II of Judge Bork’s opinion and in the result reached by Part III. I write separately, however, to emphasize my understanding of the showing necessary before a court may supplement the record by examining transcripts of a closed commission hearing. I cannot accept the view, supra at 44-45, that a petitioner asking a court to review transcripts of this nature must always make a prior and independent showing of agency wrongdoing before the court will examine the transcripts. Like a bank policy of offering loans only to borrowers who do not need loans,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. Porter County Chapter of Izaak Walton League of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Railway Labor Executives' Association v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API