Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, Circuit Judge
(after'stating the facts as above). The railway company assigns error upon the ruling that the lumber company is not required to cut 75,000,-000 feet of timber and ship 60' per cent. o>f the lumber manufactured therefrom over the lines of the railway company; (2) that the lumber company is not required to -ship 60 per eent. of the lumber manufactured from timber cut on the lands described in the contract to points East on the Northern Pacific Railway, and in adjudging that such provision of the contract is in conflict with public policy and void; (3) that the lumber company had complied with…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Hobbs v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Market St. Ry. Co. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1925
- Copper River Packing Co. v. Alaska S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Feraco, Inc. v. Georgia Pacific Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1970
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. Western Maryland Ry. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.