Rodebush Ex Rel. Rodebush v. Oklahoma Nursing Homes, Ltd.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentSimms, Justice
I must respectfully dissent. Not only do I believe that the nursing home is not liable for the intentional tort of its employee, but I am also troubled by the majority’s determination that the cap on punitive damages may be lifted pursuant to 23 O.S.Supp.1986, § 9 under the facts of this case. In my estimation, this is, at best, a case of negligent hiring and training, and presents nothing further in the way of tort liability on the part of the nursing home.
I
RESPONDEAT SUPERIOR LIABILITY
It is settled law that in order to hold an employer liable for the intentional tort of its *1253employee, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mistletoe Express Service, Inc. v. CulpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Hill v. McQueenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Russell-Lock Super-Service, Inc. v. VaughnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Tulsa General Drivers, Warehousemen, & Helpers Union v. ConleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Allison v. Gilmore, Gardner & Kirk, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.