Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lebow v. Cameron

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 12, 1965Published

1DissentMontgomery, Judge

In the second appeal in this litigation, Cameron v. Lebow, Ky., 366 S.W.2d 164, the following quotation therefrom presented the question for review:

“In the present appeal the trial court had found that the lessees, Cameron, et al., appellants and plaintiffs below, had abandoned their 1939 lease, and that Lebow, et al., appellees and defendants below, holders of a later (1956) lease on the same property, had acquired their lease as bona fide purchasers. It is the appellants’ contention that the trial court’s finding of facts and conclusions of law are clearly erroneous.”

*778In upholding the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Swiss Oil Corporation v. HuppCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. Loeb v. ConleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Hutchings v. Louisville Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
  4. E. F. Prichard Co. v. Heidelberg Brewing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
  5. Cameron v. LebowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API