Cameron v. Lebow
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
MILLIKEN, Judge.
This is the sequel to Cameron v. Lebow (1960), Ky., 338 S.W.2d 399, wherein we reversed a judgment entered on the pleadings under CR 12.03 and concluded that both issues of law and fact were presented which required development “by further pleading and perhaps proof. The complaint invites the issue of abandonment (of a 1939 oil lease), but also contains allegations tending to impair this defense.” In the present appeal the trial court had found that the lessees, Cameron, et al., appellants and plaintiffs below, had abandoned their 1939 lease, and that Lebow, et al., appellees…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hoff v. Girdler CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
- Cameron v. LebowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
- Walter v. Ashland Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
- Browning v. CavanaughCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hendrix v. HendrixSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Elkhorn City Land Company v. Elkhorn CityCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
- Lebow v. CameronCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
- Hurley Enterprises, Inc. v. Sun Gas Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1982
- Cameron v. LebowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.