Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Moll

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided January 12, 1993No. 91-M-368PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER

MATSCH, District Judge.

The Court having considered the FDIC’s motion for entry of default judgment against defendants Marvin W. Moll, Douglas E. Moll, Daniel C. Moll, William C. Easton, III (“Ea-ston”), and Thomas C. Poletti (“Poletti”), the confession of judgment of defendant Stephen M. Peterson (“Peterson”), the FDIC’s motion for entry of judgment against Peterson, the FDIC’s motion for summary judgment against defendant David L. Moll, the FDIC’s memorandum in further support of its motions for entry of judgment, the affidavits supporting the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Jerome Otteson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  4. Michelsen v. PenneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, a United States Corporation v. Bank of Boulder, a Colorado CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barton v. Adams Rental, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. FDIC v. Chicago Title Insurance CompaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Chicago Title Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API