Legal Opinion

Coster v. Piekarski

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 2000No. S-8928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A bailor alleged the loss of valuable jewelry she concealed with the bailee's permission in the bailee's home. Was it error to grant summary judgment to the bailee whose affidavit stated that his home had been burglarized and that he had taken steps to secure the home? We conclude that it was, because there are genuine, material fact disputes about whether the burglary caused the loss. We therefore reverse and remand.

II,. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Carolyn Coster sued Andrew Pickarski alleging negligent bailment. Coster testified in a deposition that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. O'Neill Investigations, Inc. v. Illinois Employers Insurance of WausauAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. StanleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Arctic Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Raleigh, Schwarz & PowellAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Silvers v. SilversAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Leonardo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Gavora, Inc. v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API