United States v. One 1956 2-Door Chevrolet, Etc., United States of America v. One 1957 Ford, Etc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSEN, Chief Judge.
One Hardesty and one Banfield had been charged, in the Western District of Missouri, with attemping to transport intoxicating liquor from Missouri to Oklahoma (then a “dry” State), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1262. On a trial without a jury, the court acquitted them of the charge, after suppressing as evidence the liquor involved, on the ground of illegal search and seizure.
The Government further had instituted forfeiture proceedings, under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3615, against the liquor and against a Chevrolet automobile belonging to Hardesty and a Ford automobile belonging to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. Lane Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. One 1956 Ford Tudor Sedan (Victoria) Motor No. M6nv-112513 (Steve Kaluk, Jr., Claimant)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- Harry Patrick McCarthy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Milton Eldo Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lem Pigg, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Lem Pigg, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Lem Pigg, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964