Legal Opinion

Township of Clinton v. Carmat, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 10, 1981No. 1476PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge:

On April 17, 1980, plaintiff-appellee, Township of Clinton, filed a complaint in equity seeking a preliminary injunction and, eventually, a permanent injunction to restrain the appellants-defendants (Carmat) from operating a business known as “Liberty House” in said township. Simultaneously, it requested the court to issue a rule to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue, which was granted that same day. The order granting the rule set April 30, 1980, at 2 p. m. as the time for a hearing on the rule. This date was later changed to, and the hearing held on,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Herman v. DixonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Slott v. Plastic Fabricators, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Drum v. DinkelackerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Soja v. Factoryville Sportsmen's ClubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Thermo-Guard, Inc. v. CochranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Berger ex rel. Berger v. West Jefferson Hill School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Christo v. Tuscany, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. LARA, Inc. v. Dorney Park Coaster Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API