Legal Opinion
Tarkett, Inc. v. Congoleum Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 30, 1994No. Civ. A. No. 91-4830PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
Following trial in this patent infringement action, the parties have both filed post-trial motions for partial judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b). In the alternative, plaintiff seeks a new trial. Defendant additionally seeks a partial amendment of the judgment, as well as attorneys’ fees and costs. For the reasons set forth below, the parties’ motions for judgment as a matter of law, plaintiffs motion in the alternative for a new trial, and defendant’s motion for amendment of the judgment all will be…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Delores Simmons, Administratrix of the Estate of Daniel La Friscoe Simmons v. The City of Philadelphia Police Officer A. Panati, Badge No. 2587Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- The Standard Oil Company, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. American Cyanamid Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Wahpeton Canvas Co. v. Frontier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Donnelly Corp. v. Gentex Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996