Legal Opinion
State v. Opperman
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1975No. File 11440PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINANS, Justice.
Defendant-appellant was convicted of possession of less than one ounce of marijuana in violation of SDCL (1967) 39-17-95. He contends, as he did in the court below, that it was error for the' trial judge to allow the product of the search and all fruits flowing from it to be introduced into evidence because the search was in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States-Constitution.
The facts surrounding this search are as follows: During the early morning hours of December 10, 1973, Vermillion police officer, William Herrick, issued a parking ticket to appellant’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Davenport v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. OppermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Commonwealth v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Autran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.