Legal Opinion

Shalov v. Rosovsky

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 21, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Order unanimously reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs to appellant, and motion denied, with ten dollars *133costs. While the defendant’s explanation of his default could well have been deemed sufficient, the papers submitted by him upon the motion to set aside the inquest do not show that he has any defense to the action. He admits making the check upon which the plaintiff sues and says it was given as commission for the sale of a drug store business. The only defense asserted in the motion papers is that the plaintiff was not a licensed broker. That is not a defense. A broker need not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Weingast v. Rialto Pastry Shop, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dodge v. RichmondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  2. Flammia v. Mite CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1975
  3. Schultz v. Palmer Welloct Tool Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  4. Schultz v. Palmer Welloct Tool Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API