Legal Opinion

In re Uber Technologies, Inc., Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided October 3, 2016No. MDL No. 2733PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

Before the Panel:* Plaintiffs in one action in the Northern District of Illinois (Cálmese) move under, 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize this litigation in the Northern District of Illinois. This litigation currently consists of eight actions pending in five districts, as listed on Schedule A.1 The *1387actions allege that Uber Technologies, Inc. (Uber) violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. § 227, by sending unsolicited text messages to plaintiffs’ wireless telephones without their prior express consent or after they revoked consent, using an automatic…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Sirius XM Radio, Inc., Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2015
  2. In re Quaker Oats Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Oatmeal Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2016

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Quevedo v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
  2. Roy v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API