Maas v. Sullivan
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Proskauer, J.:
Plaintiffs bring a representative action on behalf of themselves and all other bondholders of the Interborough-Metropolitan Company similarly situated. Ernestine Mauzer, also a bondholder, moves to intervene as a party plaintiff. Defendants urge that she is not similarly situated with the plaintiffs. All were originally holders of the same kind of bonds. Plaintiffs, however, surrendered their bonds to a reorganization committee and, according to the defendants’ claim, thus changed their status. The intervener did not sign the reorganization agreement. The signature of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- MacArdell v. OlcottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
3Cited by7 opinions
- Overfield v. Pennroad CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Bookman v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
- Blaustein v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co.New York Supreme Court · 1940
- Kawahara v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Coane v. American Distilling Co.New York Supreme Court · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.