Legal Opinion

Martin v. Peet

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Broome county. Action by Eliza A. Martin against Charles B. Peet and others. From a judgment of nonsuit, and an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHardin, P. J.

Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that November 1, 1889, and for several years prior thereto, the Equitable Accident Association of Binghamton was a corporation organized under the laws of the state of New York, engaged in an accident insurance business, and that during said time Dunn and Ross were directors, and Arnold was secretary and manager, and Murray was attorney for the association, “and that they were the persons most largely interested in the conduct and management of the business of said association, financially and otherwise.”- The complaint alleges that on the 23d day of November,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Beveridge v. New York Elevated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Garnsey v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Butts v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. Durnherr v. . RauNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Carrier v. United Paper Co.New York Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leary v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  2. Root v. City of Saratoga SpringsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. Weinbaum v. Algonquin Gas Transmission Co.New York Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API