Legal Opinion

Martin v. Lovorn

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided January 8, 1998No. 14-96-01137-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURPHY, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in a declaratory judgment suit. Appel-lee, Julia R. Lovorn, (“Lovorn”), brought a declaratory judgment action against appellant, Janette B. Martin (“Martin”), to establish her right to attorney’s fees awarded in an underlying suit in which she represented Martin. Martin filed a counterclaim for a declaratory judgment. After considering cross motions for summary judgment, the trial court entered judgment in favor of Lo-vorn and denied additional attorney’s fees to either party. In two points of error, Martin contends: (1)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Evans v. Jeff D. Ex Rel. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Venegas v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Baldwin, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  2. McAfee, Inc. v. Agilysys, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API