Amoso Realty, LLC, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Monique Milton, Defendant/Respondent, and Bryce Weathers, Proposed Intervenor/Appellant.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKurt S. Odenwald, Judge
Introduction
Bryce Weathers (‘Weathers”) appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion to intervene in Amoso Realty’s (“Amoso”) suit for rent and possession against Monique Milton (“Milton”). Weathers filed his motion to intervene after Amoso (the plaintiff and counter-defendant) and Milton (the defendant and counter-plaintiff) filed a voluntary dismissal of all claims against one another under Rule 67.02(a). 1 Because the trial court’s order denying Weathers’s intervention motion was not a final appealable judgment under Section 512.020, 2 we dismiss this appeal.
Factual and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of St. Louis v. HughesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Buemi v. KerckhoffSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- State of Missouri ex rel. Attorney General Chris Koster and the Missouri Petroleum Storage Tank Insurance Fund Board of Directors v. ConocoPhillips Company and Phillips 66 Company, and Cory WagonerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
- Kessinger v. KessingerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Basta v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chastain v. GearyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017