Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Local 456, Teamsters & Chauffeurs Union

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 10, 1978No. 78 Civ. 1675Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.

Petitioner Edward H. Bennett, Acting Director of Region 2 of the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”), seeks a preliminary injunction under § 10(7) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160(7) (“the Act”), 1 to restrain the respondent, Local 456 of the Teamsters and Chauffeurs Union (“the Union”) from picketing claimed to be “secondary” in violation of § 8(b)(4)(B) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b)(4)(B). While the Union’s primary dispute is with Carvel Corp. (“Carvel”), the picketing — should the Union ultimately prevail 2 —…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Fruit & Vegetable Packers & Warehousemen, Local 760Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, Engineers, Chemists & Technicians, Local 231District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  5. Vulcan Materials Company v. United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, and United Steelworkers of America, Local Union No. 2176Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API