Legal Opinion

Haycock v. Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the World

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Apiread from a judgment of the circuit court for Sauk county: James O’Neill, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtTimlin, J.

This action is by the beneficiary named in a death benefit certificate issued by a Nebraska corporation called “Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World.”' The defendant is organized on the plan of having one principal or head lodge or camp with numerous local or subordinate camps, to each of which it issues what is called a charter. In the certificate and in the by-laws each' member is called a sovereign and he is also entitled, in case he has complied with all the conditions of the beneficiary certificate and by-laws, to a death benefit ranging from $1,000 to $3,000. The certificate in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Modern Woodmen v. TevisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  2. Murphy v. Independent Order of the Sons & Daughters of Jacob of AmericaMississippi Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Knights of Columbus v. Burroughs' BeneficiarySupreme Court of Virginia · 1908
  4. Henton v. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the WorldNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Knoebel v. North American Accident InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Huntington v. Fraternal Reserve Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Havlicek v. Western Bohemian Fraternal Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Phillips v. Fraternal Reserve Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API